AC

Anthony Curro

Counsel

Anthony Curro is a patent attorney with significant experience in patent prosecution as well as patent licensing and litigation. His focus over the past few years has been patent applications centered around artificial intelligence technology, but he has also drafted and prosecuted hundreds of patent applications in technologies including cloud computing, computer networking, blockchain, and databases, as well as mechanical and other inventions. He has significant experience taking an aggressive approach during prosecution by pursuing ex parte appeals of patent applications to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in order to seek the broadest claim coverage possible.

Prior to joining Harrity & Harrity, Anthony was a senior attorney at IBM. During his nine years at IBM, Anthony drafted and prosecuted a large number of patent applications, managed outside counsel, defended against patent licensing assertions, assisted with IBM AI policy submissions to the federal government, helped with mergers & acquisitions, prepared licenses for open-source software, and prepared commercial agreements.

Anthony was also a patent attorney with law firms in New Jersey, New York City, and northern Virginia, as well as a patent examiner in a computer networking/cryptography art unit of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. He also has experience practicing IP litigation and commercial litigation at law firms in Manhattan and northern Virginia prior to serving with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

During college and law school, Anthony studied in different parts of Italy and is conversationally fluent in Italian from study of the language and these experiences.

During his free time, Anthony enjoys skiing, aikido, fishing, scuba diving, and travel.

Education

  • Tulane University School of Law (J.D.) – 2005
  • Colgate University (B.A., background in computer science/history) – 2002
  • L’Università di Venezia, Ca’ Foscari (Italian Language and Art History Cert.) – 2000

Admissions

  • United States Patent & Trademark Office
  • New York
  • New Jersey
  • District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

Recognition & Authored Content

  • Osha, J.P. (ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions, 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer (2023) (contributed regarding the history of artificial intelligence).
  • Andrew Karpan, More AI, More Problems, Attorneys Tell Patent Office, Law360 (April 25, 2023) (mentioning his participation for IBM at the USPTO Listening Session, discussing the undue burden of itemizing AI contributions in patents and the lack of a consistent definition for what AI even is).
  • Andrew Karpan, Tech, Drug Cos. Back Ban On AI As Inventor On Patents, Law360 (May 16, 2023) (citing IBM’s Official Response to the RFC, especially that the “invention creation process is still very much human-centric” and that “legal recognition of an AI system as an inventor raises pragmatic and ethical issues” such as whether AI needs to comply with the duty of disclosure, be liable for infringement, etc.).
  • Tulane Law Review, Managing Editor (2003–2005).
  • Nanotechnology Law & Business Journal, Associate Editor (2004–2005).